b'
IT DOESN\\u2019T PAY TO TRY TO CHEAT YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY
\\nLegitimate Claim Destroyed by Creating Fake Invoices Sigismondi Foreign Car Specialists, Inc. appealed the U. S. District Court\'s summary judgment in favor of State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company on State Auto\'s declaratory judgment action and statutory insurance fraud claim. In State Auto Property And Casualty Insurance Company v. Sigismondi Foreign Car Specialists, Inc., No. 21-2435, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit (November 18, 2022) the Third Circuit Court of Appeal dealt with the allegations of the insurer that Sigismondi attempted insurance fraud. FACTS State Auto issued a commercial insurance policy that provided coverage for Sigismondi\'s car repair shop.
\\nSigismondi requested an insurance payment for water damage, but State Auto denied the claim, citing fraud. The misrepresentations asserted as a defense by State Auto occurred during the claims-adjustment process. Sigismondi and State Auto retained adjusters to value the damaged inventory. The adjusters first created a joint inventory-a list of all the damaged items for which Sigismondi sought insurance proceeds. State Auto\'s adjuster, Chad Foster, then researched prices of the same or similar products to determine either a "replacement value" (if Sigismondi replaced the item) or an "actual cash value" (if not). Sigismondi\'s adjusters, or Sigismondi itself, likewise valued the items.
\\nSigismondi valued certain items higher than Foster estimated or could verify. Sigismondi presented what appeared to be original invoices from various vendors trying to convince State Auto to pay more than its adjuster calculated. In truth, a Sigismondi employee had scanned at least some of the invoices into the computer and then used editing software to change the items and prices listed by the vendors. After Foster alerted State Auto to this issue, State Auto sent Sigismondi a reservation of rights letter, requesting further documentation and highlighting a policy provision stating the policy would be void if any insureds "intentionally conceal or misrepresent a material fact concerning . . . [a] claim under this policy."
\\n\\n--- \\n\\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support'