b'
Setting Reserves & Discovery of the Insurance Claims File
\\n\\nThe insurer is required to evaluate a claim based upon its merits, and without regard to policy limits. Eastham v. Oregon Auto Ins. Co., 542 P. 2d 895 (Or. 1975).
\\nThe adjuster must determine the value of the claim without a thought to limits of liability in the policy and then compare the evaluation with the limits available. Reserves should be set realistically and are recorded in the claim file. Reserves are the adjuster\\u2019s estimate of the potential recovery the claimant would receive from a jury. Reserves should be reviewed regularly, and revised if necessary. Failure to do so can be a factor in holding the insurer responsible for an excess verdict. Kunkle v. United Security, 168 N.W. 2d 723 (S.D. 1969). (For further assistance in setting reserves see Chapter 13, \\u201cEvaluation and Settlement.\\u201d) New York uses a definition of insurance reserves that can be used everywhere. It defines insurance reserves as: The referenced provision states that: every insurer shall . . . maintain reserves in an amount estimated in the aggregate to provide for the payment of all losses or claims incurred on or prior to the date of statement, whether reported or unreported, which are unpaid as of such date and for which such insurer may be liable, and also reserves in an amount estimated to provide for the expenses of adjustment or settlement of such losses or claims (Insurance Law Section 1303 [emphasis supplied]). Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School District, 91 N.Y. 2d 577, 696 N.E. 2d 978, 673 N.Y.S. 2d 966 (N.Y. 05/12/1998). When presented with a challenge to discovery of insurance reserves information, the trial court is required to make a preliminary determination of whether the requested information is relevant in that it is admissible or is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. In making a determination in the context of discovery about the relevancy of insurance reserves information, the trial court should take into account the nature of the case, the methods used by the insurer to set the reserves and the purpose for which the information is sought, and only grant requests for disclosure when its findings of fact and conclusions of law support a determination that the specific facts of the claim in the case before it directly and primarily influenced the setting of the reserves in question. [State ex rel. Erie Ins. Co. v. Mazzone, 625 S.E.2d 355, 218 W.Va. 593 (W. Va., 2005)]
\\n\\xa9 2021 \\u2013 Barry Zalma Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost
\\n\\n--- \\n\\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support'