Red Flag -Transponders Not Required to Track Errant Aircraft

Published: Nov. 15, 2010, 4:20 p.m.

Most people don\u2019t realize that on September 11th, planes were known to be high jacked and flying around the Eastern US for over 70 minutes.\xa0 After September 11th, many wondered why our air force was unable to stop the high jacked aircraft, especially American Airlines Flight 77 which struck the Pentagon.\xa0 American Airlines Flight 11 was high jacked at 8:14. By 8:25 Boston air traffic controllers confirmed that the flight was indeed high jacked and the aircraft struck the North Tower of the World Trade Center at 8:46. \xa0 At 9:03, United Airlines Flight 175 struck the South Tower and at that time, the whole world knew that America was under attack.\xa0 It was not until 9:37 that American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.

\n

Therefore, it was a full hour and 10 minutes between the time the FAA knew that Flight 11 was high jacked and the time Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.\xa0 How could this happen?\xa0 The area around the Pentagon and Washington D.C. is some of the most heavily defended airspace in the World.\xa0 This fact led many to believe there had to be a stand down order issued which would have prevented Standard Operating Procedures from allowing these aircraft to be intercepted.\xa0 A stand-down is defined as \u201ca relaxation from a state of readiness or alert\u201d.\xa0 This certainly took place regarding air defenses on 9/11.

\n

One explanation offered was that the terrorists turned off the electronic device known as a transponder, which helps identify aircraft on radar.\xa0 As stated by the 9/11 Commission, it is possible, though more difficult, to track an aircraft by its primary radar returns without the transponder.\xa0 However, unlike transponder data, primary radar returns do not show the aircraft\u2019s identity and altitude.

\n

The 9-11 commission failed to consider the fact that the US military has more than just ground radar at their disposal.\xa0 In 2006 a golf ball was hit off the International Space Station.\xa0 New Scientist magazine reported that the ball was too small to be tracked by ground radar, but noted that,

\n
\n

\u201cUS military radar can track space debris as small as 10 centimeters across, and can sometimes see things as small as 5 cm wide if it is in just the right orbit.\u201d

\n
\n

There are 35 USAF bases within range of the 9/11 flights, which included the restricted airspace surrounding the Pentagon, Capitol Hill and the White House.\xa0 It is hard to believe that a military which possesses such a highly-sophisticated radar system would not have been able to track the high jacked aircraft without a transponder signal.

\n

Commercial airliners do not need their transponders on in order to be tracked by the FAA and NORAD.\xa0 If America was being attacked by aircraft belonging to a foreign power, it is ridiculous to think these enemy aircraft would have transponders installed to help the US Air Force shoot them down.\xa0 It is equally ridiculous to believe the FAA and NORAD lack the technology to track aircraft without a transponder signal.