Despite The Markets Rise, Its The 1% Thats Been Hit Hardest
b'I just read a very interesting article posted on the website Seeking Alpha written by the Mad Hedge Fund Trader. I\\xa0 subsequently discovered that the author is John Thomas. According to his bio, Thomas has written for The Economist Magazine and the Financial Times Newspaper, which are two of my favorite reading sources. Having spent 35 years in the investment arena, I can tell when someone knows what he is talking about.
So here\\u2019s the gist of what he is saying:
He asks, \\u201cWho has been most hurt by the change in markets after the presidential election?\\u201d
Is it the liberals, the unions, the environmentalists? Well, it\\u2019s not, so he says\\u2014it is the 1%.
How could that be, you may ask? Don\\u2019t the 1% have most of their money in stocks indicating that they would have profited greatly from the big rise in the market?
Not so, he suggests. The 1% have the overwhelming share of their wealth parked in the bond market, and with interest rates rising, the value of these bonds have dropped significantly. For those of you who aren\\u2019t familiar with the concept of rising interest rates causing bond prices to fall, the idea is straightforward: In order to be able to sell your bond that has a fixed interest rate, the price of the bond has to be adjusted to match the rate on newer bonds issued. If rates rise, a buyer can either buy the new bond at the new prevailing rate or buy a bond with a lower interest rate at a cheaper price. This will compensate the buyer for owning an older bond with a lower rate of interest.
So simply stated: As rates rise, bond prices fall.
Mr. Thomas states that bond market losses now exceed $1 trillion since Trump gained the presidency, and he posits that the worst is yet to come. Here\\u2019s a quote: \\u201cIf Trump actually implements his vast expansion of the federal deficit, ten-year Treasury bond yields could rocket from 2.42% to 6%, knocking one-third off of bond values\\u201d. \\xa0As I record today\\u2019s show, those 10-year Treasury bond yields he references are actually sitting at 2.6%!\\u2014meaning that rates have gone up even further and bond prices have dropped even more.
He also goes on to say that there has been a big shift in the make-up of bond market investors.
The bond market is heavily owned by the richest segment of the US and Global population. When large wealth was more evenly distributed, the top 1% only accounted for 1% of Treasury bond ownership. Today that figure is closer to 25%.
He says that the wealthier families become, the more conservative they are in their investment choices. Their goal shifts from capital appreciation to asset protection.
They\\u2019re less interested in return\\xa0on\\xa0their capital and become obsessed with return\\xa0of their capital. This is how the rich stay rich, sometimes for centuries, he adds.
What this means for the bond market is that these investors never sell. When they buy a 30-year Treasury bond, it is with the expectation of holding it for the full 30-year term maturity.
By holding until maturity, they can avoid capital gains tax and only have to pay interest on the coupon payments. Even better, when they die, any taxes deferred from the buildup of the appreciation in the value of their securities gets neutralized due to the rule of the stepped-up cost basis. This means that the value of the securities get a new cost when you die. The new cost will be the value of the securities at the date of death. In other words, if you bought JNJ 30 years ago and, after splits and other things, your cost was $10 per share, the taxes paid at death if your family sold the stock would not be based on the cost to the original owner of $10 per share but on the current price of $115 per share as it is today. The bottom line is that taxes are\\xa0never\\xa0really paid.
He adds to all of this the fact that 50% of our national debt is owned by foreign investors who also tend to hold paper for its full term.'