BROADCASTS.com

b"
\\n \\t* Earlier today Janet Yellen delivered her much-anticipated and way over-hyped speech at the annual Jackson Hole Symposium
\\n \\t* It wasn't as irrelevant as I thought it was going to be, but the actual relevant part of the speech was lost on just about everybody
\\n \\t* Instead they keep focusing on whether or not the Fed is going to raise rates by another .25 in September or December or maybe both
\\n \\t* In reality, whether they do or do not is irrelevant, given the nature of where we are and where the U.S. economy actually is
\\n \\t* For a small person, Janet Yellen certainly casts a large shadow over the financial markets
\\n \\t* Everybody was on pins and needles, all the traders were there with their fingers on the buttons waiting to react to anything that Yellen said
\\n \\t* I mentioned on an earlier podcast that there had already been a sell-off\\xa0 on gold stocks a couple of days ago on the anticipation of Yellen's hawkish comments
\\n \\t* The rest of the market seemed to ignore the possibility that Yellen would be a hawk
\\n \\t* Before I discuss what she said, I want to examine whether anyone on the committee could be considered a hawk
\\n \\t* A hawk is predatory; is to be feared, reflecting a tough central banker who believes in sound money
\\n \\t* On the other hand, a dove is cute and fluff; doesn't really hurt anybody
\\n \\t* A dove wants cheap money - keep interests low so as not to harm anybody - nothing to fear
\\n \\t* When it comes to hawks with respect to the Federal Reserve, the bird is extinct
\\n \\t* They are all doves and the only difference is the degree of dovishness
\\n \\t* The hawks are gone and are probably never coming back
\\n \\t* Yellen was not a hawk, and neither was Stan Fischer
\\n\\nOur Sponsors:\\n* Check out Rosetta Stone and use my code TODAY for a great deal: https://www.rosettastone.com/ \\n\\nPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy"