BROADCASTS.com

b'
\\n \\t* Today the possibility of a Fed rate hike in December rose about 10 points
\\n \\t* We\'re now at about an 80% probability, at least the way the markets assess the odds
\\n \\t* That the Fed will raise rates in December after failing to raise rates today
\\n \\t* If you remember, after they didn\'t raise rates last time there was some probability of a November rate hike
\\n \\t* But by this morning, the probability of November had pretty much been reduced to about zero
\\n \\t* With everybody believing that the Fed would raise rates in December
\\n \\t* And now, as a result of their failure to hike in November
\\n \\t* The probability apparently is now higher based on the language of their non-hike
\\n \\t* This, despite the fact that there were only 2 dissenters when the Fed didn\'t raise interest rates the last time they met
\\n \\t* Three members voted to hike and six voted not to hike
\\n \\t* This time it was 7 to 2 in favor of not hiking
\\n \\t* So what happened between meetings that caused the one guy who wanted to hike rates last time to decide he doesn\'t want to hike rates now?
\\n \\t* Is it possible that some data came out over the course of those weeks that caused him to re-assess his feelings about the strength of the economy
\\n \\t* And if so, why is that member going to flip back to "hike" in December, after just flipping to "no hike"
\\n \\t* Is it pure politics?
\\n
\\n\\nOur Sponsors:\\n* Check out Rosetta Stone and use my code TODAY for a great deal: https://www.rosettastone.com/ \\n\\nPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy'