BROADCASTS.com

\n \t* Today the possibility of a Fed rate hike in December rose about 10 points
\n \t* We're now at about an 80% probability, at least the way the markets assess the odds
\n \t* That the Fed will raise rates in December after failing to raise rates today
\n \t* If you remember, after they didn't raise rates last time there was some probability of a November rate hike
\n \t* But by this morning, the probability of November had pretty much been reduced to about zero
\n \t* With everybody believing that the Fed would raise rates in December
\n \t* And now, as a result of their failure to hike in November
\n \t* The probability apparently is now higher based on the language of their non-hike
\n \t* This, despite the fact that there were only 2 dissenters when the Fed didn't raise interest rates the last time they met
\n \t* Three members voted to hike and six voted not to hike
\n \t* This time it was 7 to 2 in favor of not hiking
\n \t* So what happened between meetings that caused the one guy who wanted to hike rates last time to decide he doesn't want to hike rates now?
\n \t* Is it possible that some data came out over the course of those weeks that caused him to re-assess his feelings about the strength of the economy
\n \t* And if so, why is that member going to flip back to "hike" in December, after just flipping to "no hike"
\n \t* Is it pure politics?
\n
\n\nOur Sponsors:\n* Check out Ethos: ethoslife.com/GOLD \n\nPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy