In December 2020, ten state attorneys general sued Google, alleging that the tech giant had created an illegal monopoly over online advertising. The lawsuit is ongoing, and just this January, new allegations in the states\u2019 complaint were freshly unsealed: the states have accused Google of tinkering with its ad auctions to mislead publishers and advertisers and expand its own power in the marketplace. (Google told the Wall Street Journal that the complaint was \u201cfull of inaccuracies and lacks legal merit.\u201d)
The complaint touches on a crucial debate about the online advertising industry: does it, well, work? This week on Arbiters of Truth, our series on the online information ecosystem, Evelyn Douek and Quinta Jurecic spoke with Tim Hwang, Substack\u2019s general counsel and the author of the book \u201cSubprime Attention Crisis: Advertising and the Time Bomb at the Heart of the Internet.\u201d Tim argues that online advertising, which underpins the structure of the internet as we know it today, is a house of cards\u2014that advertisers aren\u2019t nearly as good as they claim at monetizing our attention, even as they keep marketing it anyway. So how worried should we be about this structure collapsing? If ads can\u2019t convince us to buy things, what does that mean about our understanding of the internet? And what other possibilities are there for designing a better online space?
Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.