Image: Stanford clock tower Victor Davis Hanson: @VDHanson; Hoover Institution, and The Case for Trump; andAmerican Greatness; in re: https://stanfordreview.org/atlas-ferguson-hanson-stanford-free-speech/ At the Stanford faculty senate, Victor was spoken of poorly by a handful of professors: they’d had a green light to investigate the Hoover Institution; Niall Ferguson, Dr Scott Atlas, and Victor Davis Hanson were especially condemned—Victor for having spoken of some possible election irregularities having to do with mail-in ballots (which previously had been the subject of an alarm by the law school). One of the authors had been publicly rebuked for anti-Semitism. Here; the effort was to move Hoover off the Stanford campus. Stanford rejects Hoover because: the current administration recognizes that Hoover is an asset, but as we became more integrated with Stanford, the more the academics want more, accelerated progress their direction Abut 95% of donations to Stanford go to the left, whereas Hoover’s donations are about 50/50 left and right. Scandals incl a Chinese spy neuroscientist on campus, a terrible sexual harassment scandal, and a dozen others. Ironic that this sanctimonious faculty fixated on ideology and go after Hoover. A lot of this was generated by the Stanford Daily and the faculty. Stanford has sink to 35 out of 55 in university ratings—they think this shows that they're woke so consider it a badge of honor. Overall, a McCarthyist situation; I was maligned and written of with near-libel.