BROADCASTS.com

'On today's 'BradCast':\xa0 Many in the pundit class are telling us that progressive candidates like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are just not "electable" in the 2020 general election, so we take an evidence-based analysis to challenges those claims. It begins with dismantling the notion that pack journalism and "conventional wisdom" on such matters should be trusted -- for example, conventional wisdom assumes active-duty military members will be big supporters of Trump, but actual evidence gleaned from opinion polls, conducted by The Military Times, reveals a very different set of data (not likely to be helped by new revelations that Trump railed against top U.S. military leaders, calling them "dopes" and "babies".) Historian, author and election fraud investigator RICHARD HAYES PHILLIPS, in a new fact-based analysis now published at BradBlog.com, addresses the questions regarding Sanders "electability," based on known raw numbers from 2016 when Sanders ran in the primary against Hillary Clinton, and what opinion polls are telling us now. Based on what we know today, the data suggest that Sanders is, indeed, electable \u2013 but it's unknown whether he is more electable than someone like Joe Biden, or if it would hold after the coming tsunami of misleading Republican attacks and propaganda against whoever ends up winning the Democratic nomination. Hayes Phillips concludes that if Democrats "unite behind the ultimate winner" \u2013 no matter who it is -- they can defeat Donald Trump. Also today: new developments in the shocking story of security issues with Los Angeles County's $300 million boondoggle of a new, 100% unverifiable touchscreen voting system, including a major ballot-design flaw that computer security and voting system experts warn could be a nightmare-in-the-making for voters and candidates. The public comment period before certification of the flawed system closes Monday, Jan. 20...