Mailbag Pt. 2 - Should the Pacers go all in and make a big trade or continue to build with role players and small trades? Is the small ball lineup sustainable?
Alex and Facci are here to answer Pt. 2 of the January Mailbag! Thanks for your awesome questions and look in the description to see if your question(s) were answered on this episode!\n\n\n\nMatt Peck - Do you feel that the pacers small ball lineup is sustainable for the playoffs or long term? If not what changes do you think need to be made?\n\n\nJeff Dunham - What does #BoomBaby mean, where did it come from, how long have the Pacers used it and why do I hardly ever see it off Twitter?\n\n\nDJ Davis - if the Pacers rebound better they will likely win 25% more games. The Pacers need a 6'9 or taller PF who rebounds well and can shoot. Who can they trade for and what will we have to give up, player and/or pick(s)?\n\n\nChuck & Jamie - Put our beloved rookies under the microscope. What's your biggest compliment and biggest criticism/ improvement for each of them? Better yet- if it's hard to pick one compliment-make it a compliment sandwich- two compliments sandwiching a criticism/ improvement\n\n\nAndrew - do you think it would be more beneficial for IND in the long-term to trade smaller amounts of capital for smaller-role guys, like Cam Reddish or Pat Williams, or would it be more worthwhile to trade larger amounts for a guy like OG or Lauri Markkanen? I see arguments to both sides, and I'd be curious to hear your thoughts.\n\n\nLearn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices