b'
On today\\u2019s show we are talking about how to deal with inertia when you hit an obstacle. There are two types of inertia. The first one is obeying Newtonian physics. But we\\u2019re not going to focus on that one. Hitting an obstacle when you\\u2019re in motion usually results in a crash. But we\\u2019re not talking about physics. We\\u2019re talking about when your project encounters an obstacle. We\\u2019re talking about finding that perfect balance of persistence and knowing when to pivot.
\\nAs syndicators we have to keep our fiduciary responsibility to our investors at the forefront of our decision making process. That consists of a combination of preservation of capital and maximizing investor returns. We also have a responsibility to the employees of the organization and the residents of our properties.
\\nSo along comes a pandemic and financial performance suffers. Agreements that were in place prior to the pandemic evaporate. The choices are simple.
\\nI have several projects that have been impacted by the pandemic. In one case, there is a dramatic decrease in construction capital available for that project. So we decided to pivot and deliver a different product in that location. Our original idea was to build a 4 star hotel. But at a time when hotel occupancy is at historic lows, it\\u2019s very difficult to engage people in investing in a new construction hotel. So much of the hotel capital is waiting for the deluge of distressed properties that are expected to hit the market in the coming months. So if a hotel doesn\\u2019t work this year in that location, what should we build?
\\nWe feel that a high rise building in the core of the city is best suited to provide one of three products.
\\nAll three were analyzed at the start of the project. So a pivot to one of the alternate options was straightforward. We knew that all three products were viable in that location,
\\nWhen a lender on another project surprised us with a much higher interest rate and higher fees, we had to change gears again. The reason for higher rate was the uncertainty introduced by the pandemic. The appraiser gave a low valuation compared with the historic data. His rational was the uncertainty introduced by the pandemic. The appraiser reduced the rents in his model compared with the actual rents in the market. He also changed the cap rate compared with the market in order to account for the uncertainty associated with the pandemic. The net result was a financing that was simply unworkable. Again, you have here choices,
\\nTrying to convince a lender to fundamentally change their terms rarely works. A bad quote from one lender is hardly a reason to give up. Changing course is the only sensible option.
\\nWe have another project where the negotiations on the land have been underway for an extended period of time. In the end, the land owner put the land under contract with conditions with another buyer. The seller put the chances of the buyer closing at 50%. But somehow he had convinced himself that he had made the best choice.
\\nObstacles appear in every project, often without warning. Sometimes it\\u2019s a regulation change affecting construction. At other times it\\u2019s an increase in interest rates. This year it\\u2019s a pandemic.
\\nThe question of when to push, when to wait, when to quit, and when to pivot presents itself with every obstacle.
'