BROADCASTS.com

Liz and Andrew unpack the two recent decisions on Presidential immunity. What does it mean for the civil and criminal cases against Donald Trump? \xa0 But first, the duo unpack a recent Rule 404 filing by Special Counsel Jack Smith that reveals some (more) disturbing details of how Trump planned to hijack the 2020 Presidential election. \xa0 In the LONG Patreon bonus, Andrew and Liz parse through some seemingly-minor findings and show how they're part of the bad faith effort by Judge Aileen Cannon, FSW, to delay Trump's criminal trial for stealing national security documents. \xa0 it's a jam-packed episode you won't want to miss! \xa0 Notes Trump - Chutkan ruling on immunity https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.171.0.pdf \xa0 Trump DC Cir ruling on immunity https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.38510/gov.uscourts.cadc.38510.1208575879.0_1.pdf \xa0 Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 475 U.S. 731 (1982) https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2587191009008442950

-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter: \xa0@Openargs

-Facebook: \xa0https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the\xa0Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!\xa0\xa0@oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at\xa0openarguments@gmail.com