BROADCASTS.com

Republicans are saying that the "Clinton sock drawer case" - Judicial Watch v. NARA - means that Trump didn't violate the Espionage Act and can just declare anything he wants to be a "personal" record.

That's nonsense, of course.

Notes
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives and Records Administration, 845 F.Supp.2d 288 (D.D.C.2012)
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15818036517066124081

Donate to National Security Counselors!
https://donate.democracyengine.com/NationalSecurityCounselors/contribute

OR

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=QQY2ZQMWC6PX6

-Support us on Patreon at:\xa0patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter: \xa0@Openargs

-Facebook: \xa0https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the\xa0Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!\xa0\xa0@oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at\xa0openarguments@gmail.com