Today's episode is inspired by a law student listener question about a recent Thomas Takes The Bar Exam hypothetical, and takes a deep dive into the wonderful and wacky world of res ipsa loquitur.\xa0 \xa0What does that even mean?\xa0 You'll have to listen and find out!
We begin with a brief Andrew Was Wrong segment about Donald Trump and drone use, followed up by an Andrew Was\xa0Right segment about multiple states suing to block the implementation of Trump's HHS regulations relating to Title X that we discussed in Episode 258.
Then it's time for that deep dive into\xa0res ipsa loquitur\xa0that you didn't know you wanted until now!
After all that, it's time for some Bonus Tuesday Yodeling, in which we check in on Roger Stone's "Motion to Clarify" that was denied by Judge Jackson\xa0and an update on the House Republicans' hilariously misguided efforts to try and discredit Michael Cohen by pointing out that he sure seems to like to lie on behalf of his client.\xa0 You won't want to miss it!
Then, it's time for the answer to Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #117.\xa0 As always, remember to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page\xa0so that you too can play along with #TTTBE!
Appearances
None!\xa0 If you'd like to have\xa0either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at\xa0openarguments@gmail.com.
Show Notes & Links
Support us on Patreon at: \xa0patreon.com/law
Follow us on Twitter: \xa0@Openargs
Facebook: \xa0https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
Don't forget the OA Facebook Community!
For show-related questions, check out the\xa0Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!\xa0 @oawiki
And email us at openarguments@gmail.com
\xa0