OA258: Title X and Trump's War on Women

Published: March 5, 2019, 5 a.m.

Today's episode takes a deep dive into the latest regulations promulgated by Trump's Department of Health and Human Services regarding Title X funding.\xa0 What does all this mean?\xa0 Listen and find out!

We begin by breaking down Title X, the only federal grant program to poor people for family planning.\xa0 And -- as you might imagine -- Title X explicitly\xa0excludes funding for abortions, but remains a critical source of funding for the critical work Planned Parenthood does with low-income women, including breast and pelvic examinations, breast and cervical cancer screenings, and screenings and treatments for sexually-transmitted infections and HIV.\xa0 So, of course, the Trump Administration just defunded all of that.\xa0 Find out how terrifying the new regulations are.

After that, it's time for a ... lighter(?) segment in which we discuss the difference between clickwrap, browsewrap, and sign-in-wrap (?) agreements and learn about interesting new research into the readability (or lack thereof) of those agreements.

Then, it's time for the answer to Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #116 about a Weekend-at-Bernie's-style auto accident.\xa0 As always, remember to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page\xa0so that you too can play along with #TTTBE!

Appearances
Andrew was just a guest host on Episode 91 of the Skepticrat; go check it out!\xa0\xa0And if you'd like to have\xa0either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at\xa0openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. On Title X:\xa0 click here for the actual law (42 U.S.C. \xa7 300 et seq.); click here for the accompanying regulations (42 C.F.R. Part 59), and click\xa0here to read the new final rule promulgated by HHS regarding Title X.
  2. Here's the\xa0Sacramento Bee article indicating that California and other states intend to sue to block this rule from going into effect; and click here to read Rep. Cummings's letter regarding the rule.
  3. Here's a link to "The Duty to Read the Unreadable," the research paper we discussed in the last segment.

Support us on Patreon at: \xa0patreon.com/law

Follow us on Twitter: \xa0@Openargs

Facebook: \xa0https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

Don't forget the OA Facebook Community!

For show-related questions, check out the\xa0Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!\xa0 @oawiki

And email us at openarguments@gmail.com

\xa0