Today's episode tackles a popular article in The Atlantic which implies that, but for the machinations of one dude in the 1880s, corporations might not be "people," today.\xa0 Is it true?\xa0 Listen and find out! First, though, we continue to examine the legal genius of Stormy Daniels\xa0by answering some of the most common questions raised in response to our episode.\xa0 This begins (sadly) with a brief "Andrew Was Wrong" clarification about the operative campaign disclosure requirements as well as an analysis of the\xa0arbitration order\xa0that came to light just after we went to press with Episode 154, and more! In the main segment, Andrew takes a trip through the history of corporate personhood.\xa0\xa0After that, we answer a delightful question about hearsay from listener Dr. Jeff Otjen. Finally, we end\xa0with the answer to Thomas (and David) Take the Bar Exam Question #66 about murderous political candidates appearing on an "Iron Chef" knockoff... look, you'll just have to listen for yourself.\xa0 Don't forget to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page\xa0so that you too can play along with #TTTBE! Recent Appearances None!\xa0 Have us on your show! Show Notes & Links
Support us on Patreon at: \xa0patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter: \xa0@Openargs Facebook: \xa0https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! And email us at openarguments@gmail.com \xa0