BROADCASTS.com

b'SUPPORT ME ON PATREON\\n\\nWATCH MUSIC is not a GENRE VIDEOS and MORE\\n\\nWhen David Bowie died five years ago, I righted a big wrong. I\\u2019d been aware of him since the 1970s, knew some of his hits & \\u201880s music & offshoots like Tin Machine. Someone I really respected, but kept at arm\\u2019s length. \\xa0So I fixed that and listened to his entire catalog. I was immediately hooked. \\xa0Not just on Bowie\\u2019s legendary shape-shifting music, but on the whole idea of listening to entire catalogs. \\xa0So I did it again, and again, and again. \\xa0I\\u2019m still doing it. \\xa0At last count, I\\u2019ve gone through well over 50 artist discographies. \\xa0Truth be told it\\u2019s probably more like 150-1000 if you count all the short-lived bands.\\n\\nI call this a \\u201cchronolography\\u201d. It\\u2019s a mashup of \\u201cchronology\\u201d and \\u201cdiscography\\u201d, and here\\u2019s how I do it. I start from the artist\\u2019s earliest extant recording, and proceed chronologically from album to album - including any non-album singles. I also include solo records from any prominent band member. I read up on each album as I listen - my version of liner notes - including any career or personal info that might somehow connect to the music. And I don\\u2019t stop until I reach the last recording. This can be as few as one or two albums - like with the seminal punk band the Germs, or as many as 50 or more, like if you do the Beatles and then every Beatles\\u2019 solo career.\\n\\nThere are so many reasons why this is a worthy undertaking. Greater appreciation for the artist\\u2019s talent beyond their more popular output. Better understanding of where the artist is coming from and what they\\u2019re trying to achieve. Discovery of hidden gems and creative offshoots they may not be known for. A detailed illustration of how the artist developed through the years. Placing the artist\\u2019s work in context - both as a part of their own career and as a response to the broader music scene. Oh and it\\u2019s fun and immersive and most of the music is incredibly good. Plus it takes a lot less time than bingeing a TV show, and you can do it anywhere.\\n\\nNow here\\u2019s where it gets way better. A chronolography tells a story. Not just of that music or that career, but of the times they existed, the people involved both in and out of the band, music development as a whole, how the industry and other external pressures influenced the music (or definitively DIDN\\u2019T), and even a chunky slice of society and humanity in general. It\\u2019s like history meets documentary mixed with a novel and culminating in a time lapsed work of art. It\\u2019s so much more important than just a musical exercise.\\n\\nWe all have preconceived notions of pretty much everyone and everything we\\u2019ve ever encountered. The judgments that shape those notions are largely based on the least amount of information possible. We might know a few songs or one era when the band was hugely popular. When commerce coincided with creativity in a big way. We decide if the band was good or worth liking just from that. And hey that\\u2019s fine if that\\u2019s all you want to do, because it\\u2019s just music, right?\\n\\nNo. Not right. Why? Because for most people, how you approach one thing that matters is very similar to how you approach everything else. If you are content to settle for your own under-informed judgment on something as relatively simple as music, how likely is it you\\u2019d dig deeper when it comes to more complex subjects like politics or social or philosophical issues? Or the sum total of a person\\u2019s life?\\n\\n...\\n\\n\\n--- \\n\\nThis episode is sponsored by \\n\\xb7 Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app\\n\\nSupport this podcast: https://anchor.fm/musicisnotagenre/support\\nLearn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices'