Regulatory agency approves reduced flows through Potter Valley Project
July 29, 2022 \u2014 This week, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued two decisions that water interests in the Eel and Russian River watersheds have been waiting on for months.\nOn Wednesday, the Commission approved a drastic reduction in the flow of water through the Potter Valley hydropower project into the East Branch of the Russian River. \nThe Potter Valley Irrigation District will continue to receive 50 cfs on demand, but the flow of 75 cfs into the East Branch has been reduced to 5 cfs. The variance is effective immediately, and the change started to go into effect by 2:00 on Thursday afternoon. (An earlier version of this story stated incorrectly that only 5 cfs will come out of Lake Pillsbury. The water that comes out of Lake Pillsbury flows to both the Irrigation District and the East Branch of the Russian River.)\nPG&E still owns the project, though it recently submitted a 30-month schedule for decommissioning, which FERC approved. PG&E argued that it needed to reduce the flow in order to preserve the infrastructure at Lake Pillsbury, as well as cold water pools at the bottom of the reservoir for fish habitat. \nThe National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), declared that if the water levels in the lake went down below 30,000 acre feet, the water would get too hot for juvenile salmonids. Though there is no fish ladder at Scott Dam, which impounds Lake Pillsbury, there is a needle valve at the bottom of the dam. The valve releases water into the 12-mile section of the Eel River between Lake Pillsbury and the van Arsdale Reservoir, near the diversion tunnel that directs the water into the Russian River.\nCharlie Schneider is the coordinator with the Salmon and Steelhead Coalition, a partnership among Trout Unlimited, California Trout, and the Nature Conservancy. He said early models indicated that, in order to preserve the cold water pools, the variance should have been implemented by July 15.\n\u201cWe\u2019re glad the variance was finally approved, but I think we need to better understand and look at those models to really see what\u2019s going to happen later this summer,\u201d he said; \u201cto see if it is in fact too late.\u201d He added that conservationists are interested in preserving the 30,000 acre-feet of storage in Lake Pillsbury because in \u201cbig, deep reservoirs, the water stratifies, and the water in bottom part of the dam is cooler than the water at the top\u2026the more water you\u2019re able to retain in there, the more cold water there is in the bottom of the lake. And that\u2019s the water that gets released from the low-level outlet. So it\u2019s really about preserving water temperature in that 12-mile reach between Scott and Cape Horn dams, making sure that water\u2019s a cool enough temperature to be habitable for salmonids.\u201d\n\nElizabeth Salomone, General Manager of the Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District, expects drastic changes for human water users on the other side of the diversion tunnel. \u201cIt\u2019s unusual for curtailments to cut into what we call the pre-1914 grouping,\u201d she noted. \u201cWe do expect the curtailments to cut back into that pre-1914 category. But we won\u2019t know for sure until the State Water Board issues their findings and curtailment notices.\u201d \nSalomone expects the state will allow Upper Russian River water users enough water to meet human health and safety needs, which is 55 gallons per person per day. Some urban water suppliers have other sources, including groundwater or recycled water. And some farmers as well as urban centers have contracts to divert stored water from Lake Mendocino. \n\u201cSo not everyone will go completely without water,\u201d she concluded.\n\nThe Commission also delivered an ambiguous opinion refuting the claims of environmental groups that the Commission has the authority to amend the Potter Valley Project\u2019s new annual license to include more protection measures for wildlife. \nThe license for the Project expired on April 14. Within days, a group of conservationists and fishermen filed a 60-day notice of intent to sue PG&E under the Endangered Species Act. At the time, Redgie Collins, the Legal and Policy Director for California Trout, one of the coalition threatening the lawsuit, said that with the expiration of the license, PG&E \u201ccan no longer harm, harass, directly kill or injure salmon or steelhead at their project site.\u201d The group wanted a new round of improved mitigation measures, arguing that the Commission had discretion over whether or not it granted the annual license. \nThe Commission rejected that argument, saying that it was required to issue an annual license after the old one expired. And, while it also denied the coalition\u2019s call for an Endangered Species Act consultation, it did consult with NMFS to require PG&E to monitor water in parts of the Eel River and Lake Pillsbury.\nThe utility must pay for two state programs to monitor salmon on the mainstem and middle fork of the Eel River for a period of time. It\u2019s a...