BROADCASTS.com

b'This week, we will cover a topic that is a bit of a spin-off from a show on buzzwords\\xa0that I recently did. A listener of the show was confused about buzzwords and buzzphrases often used in the innovation space and sent me an email. We will discuss the buzzphrase \\u201cout of the box thinking,\\u201d analyze it, and discuss how you can think outside of the box to gain an edge in the world today.
\\n
\\nOut of the Box Thinking
\\nThe term \\u201cout of the box thinking\\u201d is a metaphor that means to\\xa0think from a new perspective. It originally came from some management consulting firms that were trying to solve problems in new ways. The term was attached to a concept known as the nine-dot problem. The idea is a 3 x 3 grid of dots formed in the shape of a square, equaling nine dots. The challenge is to draw a line through all nine dots without retracing over a previous line or lifting your pen. You need to use out of the box thinking to solve this problem. Initially, four lines in sort of a triangle shape were commonly used. Next, someone came up with drawing three-wide lines going around the box, touching all the dots. Then, someone solved the problem with one very fat line.
\\nIf you\\u2019ve been a long-time listener of the show, you have heard me give the challenge of answering what half of thirteen is. If you answered 6.5, you\\u2019d get an A on your math test. On an innovation test, I\\u2019d give you a C-, because you solved it with one easy answer. You could write it out as 1 and 3 and split it vertically, creating two digits. You could also write it out as Roman Numeral thirteen and split it vertically, which gives you eleven and two. There are thousands of different ways to answer these types of questions. The key is to not stop at the most obvious answer or to say it does not have an answer. Part of thinking out of the box is to think differently and understand the problem from a different perspective.
\\nThinking Styles and Types
\\nWe each have our natural thinking styles. It\\u2019s important to know what your preferred style of thinking is, and if you are a mix of different styles. Let\\u2019s dig into what those thinking styles [1] are:
\\n
\\n* Synthesist \\u2013 These people are creative and open to a wide range of ideas. The synthesist is an interesting type of person that is always exploring new things.
\\n* Idealist \\u2013\\xa0These people are always working towards a big goal. They set the bar high for themselves and others around them. Idealists are great at achieving things that nobody thought could be done.
\\n* Pragmatists \\u2013\\xa0These people take the logical approach to problem-solving. They tend to be focused on immediate results and driven by quarterly or annual achievements.
\\n* Analysts \\u2013\\xa0These people are interested in the facts and data points. Analysts have a clear procedure for doing things. They love data and are big on metrics. These people get satisfaction from achieving success by using defined processes.
\\n* Realist \\u2013\\xa0These people tackle problems head-on. They don\\u2019t feel challenged by everyday ambiguity. These are the people who get stuff done in an organization.
\\n
\\nOnce you know your style, you need to figure out how you can think differently to achieve success.
\\n 
\\nThinking Differently
\\n\\u2018Thinking differently\\u2019 [2] is the key question to tackle once you know your thinking style. I\\u2019m now going to share seven ways you can think differently. The key is to utilize all seven of these approaches to be free of blind spots:
\\n
'