What is literacy? Lionel Yaceczko on "How to Read a Book"
Ray Bradbury once remarked that, to destroy a culture, burning books is not necessary; all that is needed is to convince people to stop reading them. And, of course, the easiest way to sway people from reading is to keep them illiterate. Indeed, this is also the best way to rob them of their liberty.\xa0 Frederick Doublas once remarked that \u201conce you learn to read you will forever be free.\u201d\xa0
Now, it may be true that more people are literate today than ever before. Some statistics indicate that around eighty-six percent of adults in the world can read and write at a basic level. Compare this statistic to data from the early nineteenth century, when only twelve percent of people in the world could read, and there is indeed much to celebrate.\xa0
But, what about other forms of literacy? Are people more culturally literate now? Can they read deeply, for understanding and not merely for a surface-level comprehension? What does it even mean to be literate? As educators--and particularly educators drawing from and adding to the liberal arts tradition--it is paramount that we consider such questions.
Here to talk about reading and its many forms is Dr. Lionel Yaceczko, lover of languages and teacher of Classics at The Heights School. In this episode, Dr. Yaceczko sits down for a discussion of Mortimer Adler\u2019s How to Read a Book. Using Adler\u2019s book as a springboard, we first run through the three kinds of reading, specified by the end to which they aim:\xa0
- Reading for information\xa0
- Reading for entertainment\xa0
- Reading for understanding
Second, Dr. Yaceczko helps us tackle what he calls the perennial problems that can make reading difficult, namely vocabulary and syntax, as well as some of the stumbling blocks that are particular to contemporary readers.\xa0 Third, we consider Adler\u2019s four levels of reading:
- Elementary\xa0
- Inspectional
- Analytical\xa0
- Syntopical
In particular, Dr. Yaceczko delves into the third level of reading--analytical--the preparation for which Adler argues ought to be the goal of a liberal arts education at the secondary school level.\xa0
To be sure, the development of the capacity for analytical reading is no small task, but it is well worth the effort; for the difficulty of the endeavor comes from the loftiness of the goal. Despite the ardor of the task, rest assured: with patience our sons--and ourselves--may little-by-little grow into better readers. After all, the attainment of any goal, no matter how lofty, begins with small steps; it is from the valley that one ascends to the heights.\xa0
Show Highlights\xa0
- What is the most controversial thing we teach at The Heights?\xa0
- How Classics are the most egalitarian form of elitism
- What is literacy?\xa0
- The three kinds of reading and what this means for literacy\xa0
- Why is reading great books so difficult?
- Two perennial problems for readers
- Adler\u2019s four levels of reading\xa0
- Syntopical and Collocative reading\xa0
- What Analytical reading is and why liberal arts high schools should foster it\xa0
- How reading and writing inform each other\xa0
- What makes a work of literature beautiful?
- Can true beauty be popularized?
- The three steps to reading deeply
- What parents can do to help their sons overcome the challenges of analytical reading
- Love: the strongest motivator
Suggested Reading\xa0
How to Read a Book by Mortimer J. Adler and Charles Van Doren
Aristotle for Everybody by Mortimer J. Adler
Also on the Forum\xa0
Forming Deep Workers with Cal Newport
Eulexia: The Goal of Deep Reading by Lional Yaceczko\xa0
Summer Reading with a Purpose with Tom Longano\xa0
How to Master the Art of Reading Outside by Tom Longano\xa0\xa0
Mentioned in the Episode\xa0
A Crack in Creation by Jennifer Doudna and Samuel H. Sternberg
Timaeus by Plato\xa0
Great Expectations by Jane Austin
Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation by Joseph J. Ellis