70: Doubling-blinding dog balls

Published: Oct. 15, 2018, 4 a.m.

Dan and James discuss the recent "grievance studies" hoax, whereby three people spent a year writing twenty-one fake manuscripts for submission to various cultural studies journals. They also discuss a new proposal to shift publication culture in which researchers pledge to publish exclusively in community-run journals but only when a pre-specified threshold of support for this commitment by the research community has been met.

\n\n

Here's an overview of the episode:

\n\n
    \n
  • It\u2019s fat bear week!
  • \n
  • The new proposal to fix the stranglehold of commercial publishers in academia
  • \n
  • Flipping journals to open access
  • \n
  • The \u2018grievance studies\u2019 hoax
  • \n
  • When James first came across the \u201cdog rape\u201d paper
  • \n
  • What if you were to design the dog study properly?
  • \n
  • Should we systematically try and hoax journals?
  • \n
  • Astronomy already injects fake data, can we learn from this?
  • \n
  • Should these new hoaxes all be associated with Sokal?
  • \n
\n\n

Links

\n\n\n\n

Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/

Support Everything Hertz