60: This is more of a comment than a question
Dan and James answer listener questions on academic conferences, getting abreast of the literature, and conflicts of interest.
\n\nHere are more details of what's on this episode:
\n\n- \n
- How question times during conference seminars are useless \n
- Choosing which conferences to attend as a PhD student \n
- Feedback from our Registered Reports episode with Chris Chambers (Episode 56) \n
- People that have binged our entire back catalogue \n
- The amount of reading do you need to do to keep track of the field you work in \n
- PhD students need time to make time to read the literature \n
- People sending out half-arsed work hoping that peer-review will \u201cfix it\u201d \n
- Guest authorship \n
- When you\u2019re a native English speaker and get asked to have your manuscript proofed by a native English speaker \n
- Is it a conflict of interest to a review a paper with that includes someone you\u2019ve co-authored with in the past on a different topic? \n
- The Frontiers journal model \n
- Reviewing papers so that authors are actually grateful for your criticism \n
Links
\n\nNuzzle: http://nuzzel.com
\nPocket: https://getpocket.com
\nMendeley: http://mendeley.com
Find us on Twitter:
\n\ntwitter.com/hertzpodcast
\ntwitter.com/dsquintana
\ntwitter.com/jamesheathers
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/