56: Registered reports (with Chris Chambers)
Dan and James are joined by Chris Chambers (Cardiff University) to discuss the Registered Reports format.
\n\nHere\u2019s an overview of what they covered:
\n\nWhat is a registered report and why should we implement them? [1:47]
\nThe impact of conscious and unconscious bias on scientific publication [6:17]
\nCommon objections to registered reports [8:21]
\nThe slippery slope fallacy [14:33]
\nThe advantages of registered reports for early career researchers [15:47]
\nThe generational divide for embracing methodological reforms [19:13]
\nThe launch of registered reports in 2013 [23:30]
\nThe \u201ctone debate\u201d in psychology [24:50]
\nDealing with publishing decisions as an early career researcher [27:30]
\nUsing registered reports to disarm your research rivals [30:52]
\nA peek behind the curtain of peer-review [34:40]
\nHow do we convince journals to take up the registered report format? [36:28]
\nUsing registered reports for meta-analysis [38:40]
\nWhat\u2019s something that Chris has changed his mind about recently? [43:14]
\nWhat\u2019s Chris\u2019 favourite failure? [48:23]
\nChris\u2019 opinion of Wales [51:49]
Links
\n\nThe Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology https://www.amazon.com/Seven-Deadly-Sins-Psychology-Scientific/dp/0691158908
\nChris Chambers on Twitter @chrisdc77
\nDorothy Bishop\u2019s blog on how registered reports provides better control of the publication timeline http://deevybee.blogspot.no/2016/03/better-control-of-publication-time-line.html
\nThe Startup Scientist podcast https://shows.pippa.io/startupscientist
\nStartup scientist on Twitter @Startup_sci
\nThe open science pyramid (slide 8) https://osf.io/yq59d/
\nThe Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology \u201cpower posing\u201d issue http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rrsp20/2/1?nav=tocList
\nDan on Twitter @dsquintana
\nJames on Twitter @JamesHeathers
Music credits Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Chris Chambers.