BROADCASTS.com

In this episode, James sits in the guest chair as Dan interviews him on his recent work find and exposing inconsistent results in the scientific literature.

Stuff they cover:

\n
• How James got into finding and exposing inconsistent results
\n
• The critiques of James\u2019 critiques
\n
• How James would do things differently, if he were start over again?
\n
• Separating nefarious motives from sloppiness
\n
• The indirect victims of sloppy science
\n
• Grants that fund sloppy science take resources from responsible science projects
\n
• If people actually posted their data and methods, James\u2019 job would be much easier
\n
• Registered reports improve the quality of science
\n
• If James could show one slide to every introductory psychology lecture what would it say?
\n
• The one thing James believes that others think is crazy
\n
• What James has changed his mind about in the last year
\n

Links

The Sokal hoax: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
\nJames\u2019 Psychological Science paper: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956797615572908
\nThe @IamSciComm Tweetstorm on podcasting: https://twitter.com/iamscicomm/status/935851867661357057

Support Everything Hertz