BROADCASTS.com

Dan and James celebrate their 50th episode with a live recording! They cover a blog post that argues grad students shouldn\u2019t be publishing, what\u2019s expected of today\u2019s postdocs, and the \u2018tone\u2019 debate in psychology.

BONUS: You can also watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz podcast channel (link below)

Other stuff they cover:

\n
• James offends a sociologist, as is his wont
\n
• The argument for why grad students shouldn\u2019t publish
\n
• Gatekeepers controlling what\u2019s being published
\n
• Editors that Google authors before sending papers out for review
\n
• Judging researchers on their institution\u2019s location
\n
• James on networking
\n
• How do you challenge reviewers when they say you are "too junior"
\n
• The standards of Frontiers papers
\n
• Writing review papers for the wrong reasons
\n
• Why are there so many meta-analyses?
\n
• Pre-registering your meta-analysis
\n
• Registered reports vs. pre-registration
\n
• What\u2019s expected of today\u2019s postdocs
\n
• How many papers should you peer review?
\n
• How James tried to ward off review requests
\n
• Things that millennials are ruining
\n
• The role of humour in the tone debate
\n

Links
\nEpisode video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj3WsTiUuLo&t=3s

The \u201cshould grad students publish" article: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/23/renewed-debate-over-whether-graduate-students-should-publish#.WaGAeN_v8jI.link

Prospero meta-analysis registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/

Eiko Fried\u2019s tweet on postdoc expectations: https://twitter.com/eikofried/status/902470702892290048

James\u2019 publons profile: https://publons.com/author/1171358/james-aj-heathers#profile

JANE: http://jane.biosemantics.org

Anonymous PubPeer comments: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E0DAEBEC6183646F18F4FAED03B1A#7

Support Everything Hertz