Published: Aug. 17, 2016, 6 p.m.
Science funding has a series of built in incentive structures, but what sort of science does this produce?
\n\n
Some of the topics discussed:
\n\n
\n- Feedback from our 'Public health and Pokemon' episode (#22)
\n- Incentive structures in science
\n- What we should be doing in science compared to what we are doing
\n- Quantity vs. Quality
\n- The analysis of Trump's tweets for negativity vs. positivity
\n- Pre-registration
\n- How much detail do you need to go into when it comes to pre-registering an analysis
\n- APS journal badges - they're working!
\n- Data sharing makes you more careful with your data
\n- Solutions to the incentive problem have to come from the policy level
\n- The grant funding lottery system proposal
\n- The PhD oversupply
\n- Gaming the system
\n- James wants to mandate science communication
\n- Dan wants to include replication studies in PhD programs
\n- Scientist names that suit their research area
\n
\n\n
Links
\n\n
\n- The article on incentive structures
\n
\n\n
https://medium.com/the-spike/how-a-happy-moment-for-neuroscience-is-a-sad-moment-for-science-c4ba00336e9c#.x3sea13i1
\n\n
\n- The Allen brain atlas
\n
\n\n
http://observatory.brain-map.org
\n\n
\n- Analysis of Trump's tweets
\n
\n\n
http://varianceexplained.org/r/trump-tweets/
\n\n
Facebook page
\n\n
https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\n
Twitter account
\n\n
https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
Support Everything Hertz