BROADCASTS.com

Published: July 6, 2016, 11 a.m.

Dan and James discuss a recent paper on intranasal oxytocin and spirituality

\n\n

Some of the topics discussed:

\n\n

\n
• A summary of a recent paper on oxytocin and spirituality
\n
• Why within-subject designs are a better choice for oxytocin research
\n
• The physiology of nasal administration
\n
• How do you control for differences in nasal environment
\n
• Hypothesis-driven vs. exploratory research
\n
• Oxytocin pathway gene
\n
• ANCOVA and Lord's paradox (yep, it's called that)
  
\n
• Dan applauding the authors for posting ALL their data online
\n
• James disagrees with Dan on approaches to pre-registering studies
\n
• James promises never to chew during a recording (sorry!)
\n
• Producing research vs. actually reading other people's research
\n
• Our first citation (sort of)
\n
• How the replication crisis is the fact that we're not doing any
\n
• Heart rate variability in oysters (and other animals)
\n

\n\n

Links

\n\n

\n
• The paper
\n

\n\n

http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/06/22/scan.nsw078

\n\n

\n
• Dan's blog post on intranasal oxytocin administration considerations
\n

\n\n

https://medium.com/@dsquintana/intranasal-drug-administration-in-psychiatry-80d076f1abdd#.dsdrrohdu

\n\n

\n
• Dan's paper on the promise and pitfalls of intranasal administration
\n

\n\n

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26552590

\n\n

\n
• The data from the paper
\n

\n\n

https://osf.io/mjhzw/

\n\n

\n
• Our first (blog post) citation
\n

\n\n

https://rhythmicpsychology.wordpress.com/2016/06/22/shock-shock-horror-horror/

\n\n

\n
• Can we replicate the replication crisis?
\n

\n\n

https://theconversation.com/is-psychology-really-in-crisis-60869

\n\n

Facebook page

\n\n

https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/

\n\n

Twitter account

\n\n

https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast

Support Everything Hertz