18: Data sharing
Withholding data: bad science or scientific misconduct?
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\n- \n
- Dan raises privacy issues surrounding sharing data \n
- What are the limits of AI to identify people from 'un-identifiable' data? \n
- The new age of sharing data \n
- What grinds Dan's gears \n
- Requesting data from people who said that they'd actually share their data \n
- James' experiences with requesting data \n
- Dan offers a solution for accessing data via an independent 3rd party \n
- When is a data request 'vexatious'? \n
- Hiding data vs. just being lazy with data management \n
- The importance of sharing your analysis code along with the data \n
- Version controlling manuscripts \n
- How much will open data actually improve science? \n
- 'Fake' journals masquerading as real ones \n
- Australia's windfarm commissioner (a real thing, unfortunalty) \n
- Australian coffee vs. the rest of the world
- Our Twitter followers numbers have surpassed our Facebook fans! \n
Links
\n\n- \n
- The paper on requesting data \n
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22686633
\n\n- \n
- The blog post on whether withholding your data is scientific misconduct \n
Facebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\n