BROADCASTS.com

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psychology studies and manipulated sample size, sample representativeness, p-values, and institutional prestige

Links

\n
• The paper on how science journalists evaluate psychology papers
\n
• The preprint paper on small samples
\n
• Laboratory Life by Bruno Latour
\n

Other links
\nEverything Hertz on social media

\n
• Dan on twitter
\n
• James on twitter
\n
• Everything Hertz on twitter
\n
• Everything Hertz on Facebook
\n

Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!

\n
• $1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
\n
• $5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
\n

Citation

Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, September 30) "173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/SG4BM

Support Everything Hertz