BROADCASTS.com

Published: April 5, 2021, 5:45 a.m.

Dan and James discuss the recently proposed "transparency audit", why it received so much blowback, and the characteristics of successful reform schemes

\n\n

The specifics...

\n\n

\n
• The computational research integrity conference
\n
• The transparancy leaderboard proposed by Curate Science
\n
• Our episode with Chris Jackson, that James mentioned
\n
• What about a transparency leaderboard for instiutions?
\n
• What are the characteristics of grassroots reform schemes that worked?
\n

\n\n

Other links

\n\n

\n
• [Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
\n
• [James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
\n
• [Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
\n
• [Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
\n

\n\n

Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)

\n\n

---

\n\n

Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!

\n\n

\n
• $1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
\n

\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n

Episode citation

\n\n

Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 5) "129: Transparency audits", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JRNP8

Support Everything Hertz