Podcasts Science Everything Hertz 121: Transparent peer review

121: Transparent peer review

Published: Dec. 7, 2020, 7 a.m.

Dan and James discuss the pros and cons of transparent peer-review, in which peer review reports are published alongside manuscripts, as a keynote feature at the recent Munin Conference on scholarly publishing.

\n\n

Here's what they cover and some links:

\n\n
    \n
  • Watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz YouTube page
    • \n
  • What is transparent peer-review?
    • \n
  • The permanancy of open peer review reports
    • \n
  • CLOCKSS provides a sustainable dark archive to ensure the long-term survival of Web-based scholarly content
    • \n
  • Open peer reviews provide additional info for historians
    • \n
  • What changes when you know that your review is going to be public?
    • \n
  • A Motte-and-bailey castle
    • \n
  • An update and summary of the 450 movement
    • \n
  • Involving patients/user representatives in the peer review and disemination process
    • \n
  • The GRIM test
    • \n
  • What about the publication of peer review reports for papers that are rejected?
    • \n
  • The mega-analysis paper that Dan and James were co-authors on
    • \n
  • Thank you to the organisers of the Munin conference for the invitation!
    • \n
\n\n

Other links

\n\n\n\n

Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)

\n\n
\n\n

Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!

\n\n
    \n
  • One dollar a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
    • \n
\n\n- Five dollars a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n

Episode citation

\n\n

Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, December 7) "121: Transparent peer review", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S2948

Sponsored By:

Support Everything Hertz