From the Archives: Is Cell Phone Radiation Dangerous?

Published: March 16, 2022, 7 a.m.

This episode originally aired on 11/22/2019. New episodes coming soon.\xa0

Learn about how human goals fall into 4 categories; why NASA\u2019s Planetary Protection Independent Review Board (PPRIB) says we don\u2019t need to be so careful about infecting other worlds; and whether cell phone radiation is actually dangerous.

In this podcast, Cody Gough and Ashley Hamer discuss the following story from Curiosity.com about why a NASA panel says we don\u2019t need to be so careful about infecting other worlds: https://curiosity.im/2K3gzJg

Additional sources discussed:

  • Psychologists analyze language to categorize human goals | EurekaAlert! \u2014 https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-10/uow-pal102919.php
  • Lexical Derivation of the PINT Taxonomy of Goals: Prominence, Inclusiveness, Negativity Prevention, and Tradition | The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College \u2014 https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1092&context=psyfac
  • Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for Cellular Telephones | Federal Communications Commission \u2014 https://www.fcc.gov/general/specific-absorption-rate-sar-cellular-telephones
  • The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation | Forbes \u2014 https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2018/02/02/the-truth-about-cell-phone-radiation/#4a98baa192a3


Want to learn even more? Head to discovery+ to stream from some of your favorite shows. Go to discoveryplus.com/curiosity to start your 7-day free trial today. Terms apply.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.