What the Concurrences Should Have Said
b'The concurrence by three Justices (as opposed to that of Justice Barrett) in Trump v. Anderson concurs only in the judgment.\\xa0 We look at different types of concurrences and why a Justice might choose one type or the other; and as for this one, we find much to dissent with.\\xa0 We dissect the arguments and now with the benefit of a week since the opinion, we \\u201cslow it down\\u201d and take you carefully through the logic and illogic we find.\\xa0 Can we locate common ground among justices who claim to be unanimous but in fact significantly diverge?\\xa0 And how do we address our own position, which seems to lie firmly opposed to the entire Court?\\xa0 CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.'