Testing the boundaries of executive privilege
Former President Trump has sued the National Archives and the chairman of the January 6 investigating committee, Congressman Bennie Thompson, to try to prevent the disclosure of White House papers, records and communications up to and during the riot. He\u2019s asserting executive privilege. What does that mean again? Where does the idea of executive privilege come from, and how are the interests weighed in a situation like this? And then...does a former president have a strong executive privilege claim? That\u2019s a not-very-well-explored question.
\n\nTrump is also instructing former advisers, including Steve Bannon, not to comply with subpoenas from the committee. Bannon hasn\u2019t been complying and so the committee voted to make a criminal referral to the Justice Department for contempt of Congress. Does that mean the Sergeant at Arms has a job to do? (Not just yet.)
\n\nPlus: President Trump is deposed for more than four hours, New York\u2019s new anti-SLAPP law and the Summer Zervos lawsuit, Lev Parnas\u2019s ongoing trial, and Congressman Fortenberry is indicted.