This is the first of two conversations that Phil and JF are devoting to C. G. Jung's seminal essay, "On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry," first delivered in a 1922 lecture. It was in this text that Jung most clearly distilled his thoughts on the power and function of art. In this first part, your hosts focus their energies on Jung's puralistic style, opposing it not just to Freud's monism (which Jung critiques in the paper) but also to the monism of those other two "masters of suspicion," Marx and Nietzsche. For Jung, art is not a branch of psychology, economics, philosophy, or science. It constitutes its own sphere, and non-artists who would investigate the nature of art would do well to respect the line that art has drawn in the sand. Weird Studies listenters will know this line as the boundary between the general and the specific, the common and the singular, the mundane and the mystical...
\n\nREFERENCES
\n\nC. G. Jung, "On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry"
\nJoshua Gunn, Modern Occult Rhetoric: Mass Media and the Drama of Secrecy in the Twentieth Century
\nPeter Kingsley, Catafalque: Carl Jung and the End of Humanity
\nSigmund Freud, Austrian psychologist
\nKinka Usher (director), Mystery Men
\nTheodor Adorno, \u201cBach Defended Against his Devotees\u201d
\nAleister Crowley, English magician
\nC. G. Jung, The Red Book: Liber Novus
\nBill Moyers and Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth
\nC. G. Jung, Memories, Dreams, Reflections
\nC. G. Jung, The Portable Jung
\nFriedrich Nietzsche, "On the Use and Abuse of History for Life" in: Untimely Meditations
\nWeird Studies, episode 49: Nietzsche on History
\nWeird Studies, episode 70: Masks All the Way Down, with James Curcio
\nChristian Kerslake, Deleuze and the Unconscious
\nJoshua Ramey, The Hermetic Deleuze: Philosophy and Spiritual Ordeal
\nPaul Ricoeur, French philosopher
\nRudolph Steiner, Austrian esotericist