BROADCASTS.com

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tComputer scientist and poker player Ben Kushigian talks to Carlos and Andrew about the limitations of poker solvers, what we don’t know we don’t know about them, how they could be improved, the potential for open source solutions, and more. Plus, he’s got an interesting spot from a satellite bubble for the strategy segment.Weird GTO Wizard nodeOpen Source Solver\xa0The github repo is\xa0https://github.com/b-inary/postflop_solver. This is the backing solver (so no user interface). There are two user interface versions:+\xa0https://github.com/b-inary/wasm-postflop+\xa0https://github.com/b-inary/desktop-postflop\xa0And here is a link to comparisons between postflop solver and different solver techs:\xa0https://github.com/b-inary/wasm-postflop#comparison\xa0This is the paper that it’s based on:\xa0https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.04040\xa0Strategy\xa05 players remain, 4 get paid $55+5 tickets, 1 gets $8 (so we’re on the ticket bubble). This spot seemed like a crucial moment where I had the opportunity to eat some variance but with high payoff.\xa0Hero (BB): 5.61 BBUTG (UTG): 12.86 BBCO (CO): 2.22 BBBTN (BTN): 4.5 BBSB (SB): 12.8 BB5 players post ante of 0.1 BB, SB posts SB 0.5 BB,\xa0Hero posts BB 1 BBDealt to Hero: Kc3hDealt to CO: ???\xa0fold, CO raises to 2.12 BB and is all-in,\xa0fold,\xa0fold,\xa0Hero ???\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\tBEN KUSHIGIAN\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tBen Kushigian is a poker player and computer science PhD student.\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tTwitter
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t