SFR 248: Kill The J Curve...

Published: June 4, 2019, 7:50 p.m.

I'm going to throw rocks here a little bit. Ermmm, \u2018NO,\u2019 actually it's going to be mountains, boulders and things that are VERY heavy\u2026\xa0

\xa0

I'm vehemently against this idea that we need to take on funding in order to start a company.

\xa0

The J Curve is what's taught in most of our education and mainstream entrepreneurship today.

\xa0

Case in point, the J Curve is the very model that Shark Tank operates under.

\xa0

And while I love the show, I\u2019m vehemently against the concept of the J Curve...

\xa0

In fact\u2026

\xa0

It\u2019s time to kill the J Curve.

\xa0

If you don\u2019t know what the J Curve is, all will become clear\u2026 but first, let me tell you a story of about how to make a million bucks\u2026

\xa0

THROWING A J CURVE\u2026

\xa0

I was working with Russell on a project for one of his personal clients\u2026

\xa0

For every dollar we put in an Ads, they were getting $1.30 back out. For every dollar they were putting in an Ad, they were getting $1.30 back out.

\xa0

However, one day they called, us a bit ticked off, and said, "We're barely breaking even on this?"

\xa0

I was like, "You're NOT breaking even. You're actually making 30 cents for every customer that comes in."

\xa0

They weren\u2019t happy with that answer, and they said, "Exactly, we're not going to make a ton of money on that."

\xa0

We were like, "You guys are missing the entire point here. You now have a machine where you're acquiring customers for free."

\xa0

We\u2019d created a bottom of the value ladder offer that was expanding their current customer base.

\xa0

They already had their middle of the value ladder product and they had an expensive club as well\u2026

\xa0

But what they needed was MORE blood in their value ladder to bring people in and ascend them to their more high-end offers.

\xa0

We were putting a $1 in and they were getting $1.30 back out\u2026 but they were mad about that.

\xa0

We asked, \u201cWhat are you mad about? This is a success."

\xa0

They were like, "It's NOT a success."

\xa0

We were like, "Yeah, that's a HUGE screaming success."

\xa0

BREAK-EVEN WINS

\xa0

\u2026 we said, "Let's think about this for a moment\u2026\u201d

\u201cYou have a machine that\u2019s giving you customers for FREE and you\u2019re even gaining 30 cents \u2026\u201d

\xa0

We told them:

\xa0

\u201cAnything you sell to those customers afterward is pure profit!\u201d

\xa0

Break-even is a million dollar scenario.

\xa0

\u2026 AND now, these customers are also MORE likely to purchase anything you tell them to buy.

\xa0

Still, they weren\u2019t convinced\u2026 they were like, "What are you talking about?"

\xa0

Here\u2019s a FACT:

\xa0

Second money is ALWAYS easier than first money.

\xa0

A percentage of your list will ALWAYS purchase simply because they like you and they\u2019ve had a good experience previously

\xa0

We're not just tweaking:

\xa0

\xa0

\xa0

But what's so incredible about the way this works is this...

\xa0

STARTING A BUSINESS THE WRONG WAY?

\xa0

In college, I was taught that the first things you do when starting a business are:

\xa0

  1. Write a business plan

\xa0

  1. Gather the who\u2019s who and get people on your team

\xa0

  1. Think more about your idea and do some market research

\xa0

  1. Competitive and SWOT Analysis

\xa0

  1. Look into the probability of success and do lots of analytics.

\xa0

Probably my least favorite class was Quantitative Marketing research. \xa0

\xa0

I HATED that class\u2026

\xa0

And that\u2019s literally where the phrase \u2018J Curve\u2019 comes from...

\xa0

When you start your business, since there's no revenue yet, \xa0you are expected to go into debt in order to fund the business, the people, and the systems.

\xa0

There are a series of systems in business...

\xa0

For example:

\xa0

There's a system for:

\xa0

  • Support

\xa0

  • Fulfillment

\xa0

  • Helping people actually have success.

\xa0

All that stuff costs money.

\xa0

At first, when I started my business, it was just me... but that's NOT the way I was taught in college.

\xa0

SAY \u2018HELLO\u2019 TO THE J CURVE

\xa0

In college, I was taught to get a loan and go into debt. \xa0

\xa0

#EyeRoll

\xa0

I would expect to be in debt until a magic moment three to five years away when I finally become cash flow positive.

\xa0

Meaning, I'm not losing money faster than I'm making it.

\xa0

I\u2019m NOT breaking even; I'm just finally going in a straight line.

\xa0

I'm NOT making any money, but I'm NOT losing anymore.

\xa0

Then you keep tweaking and tweaking until you reach the mark where... *hopefully*... you\u2019ve made more money than you took on to fund the business.

\xa0

And *this* is literally what I was taught in college\u2026

\xa0

When the curve moves upwards enough, then you're profitable.

\xa0

The moment the curve starts to get to a certain zone (see below) you can take profit - which is great. You make a lot of cash...

\xa0

But as soon as you start increasing at a decreasing rate, meaning the curve starts going level, you're taught to sell.

\xa0

You go into the stock market with an IPO, and you sell off your company and you no longer own your baby.

\xa0

That SUCKS!

\xa0

You work your face off, but then most of your decisions will be made by a board\u2026

\xa0

You gave away your business with golden handcuffs when you got a loan.

That's why Shark Tank irks me.

\xa0

But you can skip this entire model with what I\u2019m showing you here.

KILL THE J CURVE

\xa0

Let\u2019s go back to the ClickFunnels and the people who weren\u2019t happy with $1 in and $1.30 back out \u2026

\xa0

Here\u2019s the CRAZY part...

\xa0

$1 in and $1.30 back out means that you're skipping the J-Curve.

\xa0

It means that from the get-go, you're going up.

\xa0

Is it fast? \u201cNo, but you're not losing money,\u201d and remember, we already know that second money is ALWAYS easier than first money.

\xa0

A percentage of people will ALWAYS buy your upsell

\xa0

That's why this is such a big deal - that's why we freak out so much about doing this stuff.

\xa0

https://media.giphy.com/media/8B9hGl5neRTNK/giphy.gif

\xa0

Then when you understand more about how to create the offer and the order to build in, it means you don't have to do that VC garbage. That's why it's so awesome.

\xa0

You kill the J Curve and go straight to profitability.

\xa0

Even if things are level for a while and you're not making any money:

\xa0

  • You're not losing money

\xa0

  • You own your entire business

\xa0

  • You're actually making your own decisions.

\xa0

Merry Christmas! ;-)

\xa0

So then you start making HUGE profit... and you can sell if you want, but you don't have to - \xa0you can have cash cows like a lot of my offers are now.

\xa0

Tell me any other investments on this entire planet where I can put a dollar in and get a 30% return in a week?

\xa0

People boast when they get a 10% return on a mutual fund.

\xa0

Seriously, think about it!

\xa0

Do you know how much money you already have to have in order to actually make a living off of something like that?

\xa0

In my mind, there's no other logical way to invest in your future than doing a funnel and creating an offer the right way.

\xa0

I don't know another way.

\xa0

LET\u2019S TALK MONEY

\xa0

\u2026 when that Facebook apocalypse thing happened a while back, it kinda jacked up our stats a bit, but before that, we had two months where we were putting $1 in and getting $8 - $10 out.

\xa0

It's not as high anymore, but it's still like a $1 in and $5 out \u2026

\xa0

That\u2019s a weekly return of 500%.

\xa0

You don't take profit, if you just keep putting a dollar in, and getting a dollar back out...

\xa0

Congratulations, break even is a million dollar scenario.

\xa0

The asset is the list; so when you can build a list of buyers for FREE - BOOM!

\xa0

Most corporate companies can't even begin to comprehend what I'm teaching you right now. They don't get it.

\xa0

They're so indoctrinated in the traditional stuff that when we show them other options they're like, "I don't think that's going to work?"

\xa0

And we make it happen and they're like, "Oh, snap. HUH!\u201d

\xa0

TURNING DOWN 100 MILLION!

\xa0

At one time, there were a lot of companies trying to give ClickFunnels $100 million, and we kept saying, No.

\xa0

They were like, "Why? We'll give you $100 million with the BEST rates you\u2019ve ever seen."

\xa0

I got to sit in the room where a lot of these conversations were going on.

\xa0

I\u2019d hear Russell and the VC guys talking, and I'd be listening\u2026

\xa0

https://media.giphy.com/media/Ll1rEkDebTIdO/giphy.gif

\xa0

They\u2019d be offering all this money, and Russell's like, "We don't need it," which blew their minds.

\xa0

Russell would go to lunch just to kind of humor them, and because it would make a cool story... which it did ;-)

\xa0

The VC guys would say, "Come on, $100 million. How much money does it cost you right now to acquire a ClickFunnels person?"

\xa0

(And these are stats from a long time ago, so I'm sure the changed a little bit.)

\xa0

But at the time, as I recall, it was costing ClickFunnels about $120 to generate one trial.

\xa0

Now for the SaaS software world, $120 in ads to generate on average, one trial, that's actually very, very good.

\xa0

So when Russell said that, they're like, "Oh my gosh, are you serious? $120 to generate one trial? That's awesome.

\xa0

Here, let's give you $100 million, and then you can just go and get a butt load of trials and lots of customers."

\xa0

Russell was like, "No, no. We turned those ads off." And they were like, "Why would you do that?"

He's like, "Well, because that\u2019s coming out of our own pockets. $120, that's URRGH."

\xa0

(What I'm teaching you now is the reason to come to OfferMind\u2026)

\xa0

HACKING THE VALUE LADDER

\xa0

So if ClickFunnels is in the middle of the value ladder, ( and I'm using ClickFunnels as an example because we all know them), we\u2019d create acquisition-styled funnels\u2026

\xa0

For example:

\xa0

  • Trip Wires

\xa0

  • Book Funnels

\xa0

  • VSLs

\xa0

  • Invisible Funnels

\xa0

  • Summits

\xa0

\xa0

  • Small eCommerce stuff shipped out...

\xa0

\u2026 things that generate a buyer very cheaply.

\xa0

I know these numbers aren't accurate anymore, but the principle is still the same\u2026

\xa0

It was costing ClickFunnels $22 to generate one Expert Secrets buyer, but the average cart value, (because of upsells, the way funnels work and because we're dang good at creating offers), was $66.

\xa0

And so, think about this\u2026

\xa0

Now that we've generated a buyer for free, (put in a dollar and get three out), 22 bucks to generate a buyer with a $66 cart value.

\xa0

Divide them out, a dollar in, three dollars back out - that's awesome. I don't know another vehicle that makes that kind of cash\u2026

\xa0

And frankly, I don't know another vehicle where you can be really, really bad at it and still make a lot of cash.

\xa0

Things like the stock market, (I'm not trying to throw rocks), but the majority of the time, you gotta have freakin\u2019 ninja skills to make a lot of money - hopefully... (with flash in the pan kind of strategy to tactics). \xa0

\xa0

You can be bad at this and make a lot of cash. I definitely was!

\xa0

One of the first funnels I put out ended up making MORE money than I was making in my job.

\xa0

I was like, "Dang. That's awesome. I really can be bad at this and still make a great living."

\xa0

WHO ALWAYS WINS?

I'm not just approaching value ladder design from the aspect of, \u201cOh, this is the good order to go in\u2026\u201d

\xa0

You're playing with the reality that those who can pay the MOST to acquire customer always win, even if they have a worse product.

\xa0

Let me explain\u2026

\xa0

If I can spend $66 to acquire a book buyer and the book is only seven bucks, I'm going to dominate those who are on Amazon who have a locked average cart value that only enables you to buy one book with no upsells and OTOs...

\xa0

That's why this works. That's why what we do is so killer.

\xa0

So if I generate a buyer for free or breakeven, (if I'm making money, all the better)...I will never dare take profit at this level.

\xa0

Instead, I create sequences that invite them to ascend to the next step, and then... it's pure profit.

\xa0

The reason why we make the money we do and we don't have lots of overheads is because we're actually marketers.

\xa0

So Russell was with the venture capitalists who were trying to give ClickFunnels $100 million telling them that he\u2019d turned off adds, that in their eyes, were very profitable

\xa0

The VC guys asked, "Why would you do that?"

\xa0

Russell (very clichely) \xa0explain by drawing on a napkin, ...

\xa0

He said, "We turned \xa0those ads off and now we actually MAKE $40 per ClickFunnels trial now."

\xa0

The VC guys said, "That's impossible. How are you doing that? That makes absolutely zero sense to me."

\xa0

Russell said, \u201cNo no. It totally does."

\xa0

REWRITING BUSINESS

So let\u2019s look at it the Expert Secret \xa0book funnel numbers \u2026

\xa0

  1. Average cart value in that funnel is $66

\xa0

  1. Cost to acquire was $22.

\xa0

(I think the cost to acquire is lower now, and the average cart value is higher \xa0- but anyways, those are some of the stats I remember.)

\xa0

So they're making $40 per ClickFunnels trial - because, at the end of the book funnel, they say, \u201cGo get a free ClickFunnels' trial,\u201d and then people do - it works.

\xa0

Do you understand how mind-bending this is? \xa0

\xa0

This changes the entire business model - that's why I'm like so fierce with some of this stuff - we\u2019ve gotta push it out there more.

\xa0

Then they create all sorts of front ends - that's why he launched the \xa0Network Marketing Secrets book.

And afterward, Russell promotes ascends them on the value ladder for FREE. He already owns the list. He doesn't need to pay to acquire the customer again, and so, he just invites them to take the next step...

\xa0

*Pure Profit*

\xa0

By approaching business in this way, you can

\xa0

  • Completely negate the need for VC funding

\xa0

  • Completely negate the need to give up ownership of your company

\xa0

  • Completely negate having to make decisions that you wouldn't want to make with your baby.

\xa0

That's why it's such a big deal.

\xa0

I started in the middle of the value ladder so that I can have MORE money to acquire a customer than my competitors.

\xa0

If I sell my book on Amazon for $20... but dang it, Russell's generating $66 per book purchaser (average cart value)...

\xa0

Man, he's going to wreck me. Do you see what I'm saying?

\xa0

If I can spend 60 bucks in Ads (especially on a book) before I start losing money\u2026

\xa0

*GAME OVER*

\xa0

Again, you can be bad, but if you're breaking even, you still can upsell your most expensive things - that\u2019s straight up monetization.

\xa0

For example...

\xa0

There are several people every month who are like, "Hey, I really just want to get an OfferLab. That's the kind of hand-holding I need."

\xa0

Or ...

\xa0

\u201cI don't want to have to go read the book and go through all the stuff, Stephen. Just give me the result."

\xa0

READY, FIRE, AIM

\xa0

One of my favorite books is Ready, Fire, Aim - you can see I have it all tabbed out and stuff...

\xa0

The methods that I\u2019ve shared are something that I've been teaching and doing for a while, but then, this book validated the crap out them.

\xa0

Now if you've never read this book, and you don't know anything about it:

\xa0

  1. The first third goes from zero to 1 million - \xa0so I studied that a lot when that was the phase I was in.

\xa0

  1. The next phase of the book is 1 million to 10 million

\xa0

  1. The next phase (I think) is 10 million to 100 million.

\xa0

I spend most of my time with new people and people who are $1,000,000 to $10,000,000 in revenue - that's where most of my expertise lies for our business; new all the way up to about 10 million.

\xa0

After $10,000,000, I don't deal with people too much.

\xa0

Anyway, in the book, Masterson says\u2026

\xa0

(This is on page 118)

\xa0

\u201cAlthough your primary focus should always be on customer service, your quantifiable goal as a beginning entrepreneur should be to acquire as fast as possible, what we call a critical mass of qualified buyers/ customers.

\xa0

This is the number of loyal customers you need in order to make all or most of your subsequent selling transactions profitable."

\xa0

This is key.

\xa0

Masterson continues:

\xa0

\u201cYour goal as a stage one entrepreneurship should be to acquire as many customers as you can to make all of your subsequent selling transactions profitable...\u201d

\xa0

It's literally the exact same thing I've been talking about here

\xa0\xa0

He says:

\xa0

"And if you made your primary objective and satisfaction in selling more products to existing customers who enjoyed their prior buying experiences with you, it will be relatively easy as well as cheaper, therefore more profitable.

\xa0

Once you have a good number of qualified customers\u2026 (i.e., the middle of value ladder)...

\xa0

Hundreds or thousands, or hundreds of thousands depending on your industry, you'll be in a really good position where almost every new product you come up with will be successful because so many of your existing customers will buy it.\u201d

\xa0

Break-even is a million dollar scenario.

\xa0

*I\u2019m gonna keep pounding that point in*

\xa0

So I go in and test out my entire idea in the middle of the value ladder price point because it makes MORE sense for:

\xa0

  • Average cart value

\xa0

  • Cost to acquire

\xa0

  • Ad costs are very real today.

\xa0

I have flex room and I'm able to go and actually test stuff.

\xa0

SECOND MONEY IS EASIER

\xa0

Once you have a lot of customers, you just focus on that core offer for a while.

\xa0

Then once you've got a lot of people, anything you drop afterward is highly likely to succeed.

\xa0

As long as they enjoyed their first buying experience, it's highly likely that you're going to be successful.

\xa0

I read this and thought, "Oh my gosh." I was on an airplane and I was like, "This is exactly what I've been talking about."

\xa0

Anyway, check this out\u2026

\xa0

Masterson continues:

\xa0

"Understand the dynamics of generating long term profits through the development of large circulation, low-cost products sold at a loss\u2026\u201d

\xa0

(* NOTE ...but you don't need to do this because you can break-even)

\xa0

\u201c...by upselling high-end products to this larger base."

\xa0

Basically, the whole point of this entire thing is that, once you now have an existing customer base and you sell something more expensive, that's where you're going to cash flow hard.

\xa0

A lot of profits.

\xa0

I start at the value ladder and then move to the top, but once that\u2019s working, and I want things to be MORE profitable; how do I do that?

\xa0

I create a mechanism, (I mean, funnel/offer), at the bottom of the value ladder to acquire more customers at a break-even level - which makes subsequent selling transactions really profitable.

\xa0

If 10 people out of 100 bought my middle tier product, maybe half a person out of 100 would buy my top tier...

\xa0

But then, I just fill the hopper up.

\xa0

Q: What's introducing a lot of these things to the marketplace?

\xa0

A: The fact that I podcast.

\xa0

Dang, it! I just let that out ;-)

\xa0

  • I'm creating a relationship

\xa0

  • I'm telling a lot of stories

\xa0

  • I'm breaking false beliefs that I know the audience is having as they start to say things that I know are not real.

\xa0

I create a story around my episode - at the end of each episode, pay close attention to whatever it is that I'm promoting in the outros.

\xa0

The outros often introduce a new thing inside of the value ladder or reminds people that my product\u2019s still there.

\xa0

So I'm creating the relationship and leading with a butt ton of value. I give so much away on my podcast - it's ridiculous.

\xa0

#GetRichDoGood

\xa0

Hey,

\xa0

I know this game can take a few tries to get the money flowing, especially the first time, right? And that can suck.

\xa0

I also know from experience how frustrating it can be to know your business is just a few tweaks away from your next big payday, but you don't know what tweaks to make.

\xa0

I've felt completely paralyzed by that in the past, and it sucks.

\xa0

I've been blessed to work with thousands of new and successful businesses over the last three years, and two things have really shocked me.

\xa0

#1: I began noticing the pattern to success is vastly the same, but everyone's spot on the path is obviously different.

\xa0

#2: I've been shocked and overwhelmed by the number of people asking for my help, my systems, and funnels in their business.

\xa0

Well, until now I've never had a system or product in my own business to help you build yours.

\xa0

Now, I'm finally able to be public about all this...

\xa0

If you'd like my help to build your offer or sales message funnel and even your content machine, go to myofferlab.com.\xa0

\xa0

The path to online and offline success is 80 percent the same regardless of the product, price point or industry, and it works if you're new or already a killer in business.

\xa0

You can get more details on how to get my personal attention and frameworks in your own business by going to myofferlab.com

\xa0

In-person classes are limited to 60 people each, and frankly, I can only do about two of these a year. Get more details, and even jump on the phone with us for free at myofferlab.com