Episode 31 - Class 2 - What even is a replication?
Episode 31: Class 2 - What even is a replication?\n\nIt\u2019s week 2 of Amy\u2019s \u201cPsychology as a Robust Science\u201d course and we are discussing replications. What are they? Is there a distinction between direct and conceptual replications? Do direct replications actually exist? Tune in to (maybe) find out!\n\nRelated papers and links\n\nOpen Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science\nhttps://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716\n\nNosek and Errington (2017) Making sense of replications\nhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5245957/\n\nBrian Nosek\u2019s Queensland talk Amy mentioned (roughly between 5:00-15:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsRmyW8GmJs\n\nGilbert, Daniel T., Gary King, Stephen Pettigrew, and Timothy D. Wilson. \u2018Comment on \u201cEstimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science\u201d\u2019. Science 351, no. 6277 (4 March 2016): 1037\u20131037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7243. \n\nAnderson, Christopher J., \u0160t\u011bp\xe1n Bahn\xedk, Michael Barnett-Cowan, Frank A. Bosco, Jesse Chandler, Christopher R. Chartier, Felix Cheung, et al. \u2018Response to Comment on \u201cEstimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science\u201d\u2019. Science 351, no. 6277 (4 March 2016): 1037\u20131037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9163. \n\nBishop, Dorothy V. M. \u2018BishopBlog: Sowing Seeds of Doubt: How Gilbert et al\u2019s Critique of the Reproducibility Project Has Played out\u2019. BishopBlog (blog), 27 May 2018. http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2018/05/sowing-seeds-of-doubt-how-gilbert-et.html\n\nMusic credit: Kevin MacLeod - Funkeriffic\nfreepd.com/misc.php