\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n
In the overlapping circles of feasible, viable, desirable, what is the emphasis and culture practiced?
\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\n\nI received a question via my Mastodon account about minimum lovable product vs minimum viable product.
\n\n@Nycteris@mastodon.art: "So @robstenzinger I was just reading about \u201cminimum Lovable product\u201d vs \u201cminimum Viable product\u201d because you want to have enough features to maximize love of a core group of users - do you think this is a real strategy?"
\nRelated Links and Resources
\nMore posts and extras like coaching sessions at my Buy Me a Coffee page (coaching sessions are all sold out again, stay tuned)
\nGames and Classes Rob offers and Ways to Support the Polytechnicast
\nYou can buy me a coffee with an option to send a note along.
\nSubscribe to the Polytechnicast RSS feed in your podcast app
\n