BROADCASTS.com

Published: May 21, 2019, 7:45 a.m.

Criticisms and controversy \n\n

So yeah, Mel Gibson is bad. But then the movies are\u2026 really good? Trying to get past his framing. The tug of war between historical accuracy and entertainment. Anthropological criticism.

\n\n Deciphering history \n\n

The problem with burning nearly the entire written history of a people. Deciphering scant ancient texts. The remaining resources: art, stelae. Mayan hieroglyphic writing.

\n\n Periods \n\n

The Maya pre-classic, classic, and post-cassic periods. The scale of the height of Mayan civilization. The abruptness of its fall. The period in which the film takes place and the ways in which it is not actually entirely apparent. Classic-period pyramids in the post-classic era.

\n\n Science and math \n\n

The mixing of astronomy and astrology in the Mayan tracking of the heavenly bodies for religious purposes. The Mayan written mathematical system. \u201cInventing\u201d zero. Extensive calendaring and that whole 2012 kerfuffle.

\n\n Civilizational decline \n\n

The factors that may have contributed to the Mayan collapse. Plaster and mortar production. Deforestation for fuel.

\n\n Aztec/Maya \n\n

The possibility for cultural confusion in the film. Aztec and Maya sacrificial practices.

\n\n\n\t

\n\t\t\n\t\t\t
1. \n\t\t\t\tThe Case Study of Apocalypto by Richard D Hansen: ResearchGate\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\n\t\t\t
2. \n\t\t\t\tApocalypto by History Buffs: YouTube\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\n\t

\n\nSupport the show!