Hostage Negotiation and Behavior Analysis: What Research Tells Us About Making Requests in a Danger
An article by James Hughes in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (2009) considered how high-probability requests could influence the compliance of hostage takers to the advantage of negotiators. In 2015, Emily Mandel reviewed the article by James Hughes in bsci21.org.\n\nIn this interview with Emily Mandel we discuss hostage negotiation and how high-probability requests, that precede low-probability requests, could make a difference in a critical situation.\n\nShow Highlights:\n- Emily's interest in behavior analysis and the many applications of this science.\n- Behavioral momentum and influence on compliance. How the presentation of high-probability requests before a low-probability can matter.\n- The uniqueness of the Hughes (2009) study and how the data was gathered.\n- The limitations of the current research and where we can go from here.\n\nThe article in bsci21.org by Emily Mandel:\nhttps://bsci21.org/the-use-of-high-probability-request-sequences-in-hostage-negotiation/\n\nInformation about the three hostage situations:\n\nhttps://www.policeone.com/police-products/communications/crisis-communications/articles/1284852-Retrospective-The-1981-take-over-of-the-Atlanta-FBI-office/\n\nhttps://nypost.com/2014/08/03/the-man-who-inspired-dog-day-afternoon/\n\nhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Sacramento_hostage_crisis\n\nLook up CrimBehav on Facebook.\n\nCriminal Behaviorology on Blogger.\n\nhttps://anchor.fm/criminalbehaviorology\n\ncriminalbehaviorology@gmail.com\n\nThank you for listening.\n\n--- \n\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/criminalbehaviorology/support