BROADCASTS.com

We love you with all our non-beating hearts, Film Geeks! In this special bonus episode of the show, Andrew and Monica put on their sociology hats and explore the gender politics of a popular sub-sub-genre: supernatural young adult romance book-to-film adaptations. If you're not into that, don't worry. They spend the first 10 minutes of the show giving some overall thoughts on Beautiful Creatures as a movie before comparing its messages about gender to those in Twilight, Warm Bodies and The Hunger Games. What are the "rules" to making a good supernatural teen romance movie? Tune in to find out.
\n
\nSHOW NOTES:
\n
\n0:22 - Intro and clip
\n4:49 - General spoiler-free thoughts on Beautiful Creatures
\n13:00 - Looking at supernatural young adult romance movies; why \ufeffTwilight \ufeffis sexist
\n18:38 - Three dimensional characters and the nature of sacrifice
\n21:12 - \ufeffIs Julie in \ufeffWarm Bodies \ufeffa manic pixie dream girl?
\n27:03 - \ufeffTrying to be feminist vs. actually being feminist
\n29:55 - The idea of "claiming" and the virgin/whore dichotomy
\n35:15 - Freudian subtext, emphasizing sexuality vs. the act itself
\n40:24 - \ufeffThe Hunger Games \ufeffand Katniss as role model
\n42:58 - The "rules" for creating a compelling and progressive supernatural teen romance
\n46:43 - Show close
\n
\nDON'T FORGET: You can contact the show by emailing cinemafix@filmgeekradio.com. Thanks for listening!