Eerie Ethics - Psych Soc O'Clock - Interview 1 (Professor Helena Paterson)

Published: Jan. 28, 2019, 9:49 p.m.

 

\n

Amelia and Professor Helena Paterson delve into some \u2018eerie ethics\u2019 and discuss psychological studies which give us the creeps.

\n

References from the recording:

\n

The study that broke science:
\nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daryl_Bem#.\u2026e.22_controversy

\n

Superstitious perception:
\nGosselin,  F., & Schyns, P. G. (2003). Superstitious perceptions reveal  properties of internal representations. Psychological Science, 14(5),  505-509.
\nwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12930484

\n

The Monster Study:
\nSilverman, F. H. (1988). The \u201cmonster\u201d study. Journal of fluency disorders, 13(3), 225-231.
\nwww.spring.org.uk/2007/06/monster-study.php - (not the study itself, but includes key information)

\n

Carney Landis:
\nLandis,  C. (1924). Studies of Emotional Reactions. II. General Behavior and  Facial Expression. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 4(5), 447.
\npsycnet.apa.org/record/1926-08449-001;
\nbizzarrobazar.com/en/2017/05/28/le\u2026i-carney-landis/
\n - (summary of Landis)

\n

Mischel Marshmallow study:
\nMischel,  W., & Baker, N. (1975). Cognitive appraisals and transformations in  delay behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2),  254.

\n

Created by Amelia Hilton in association with the University of Glasgow Psychology Society
\nWritten and recorded by Amelia Hilton and Professor Helena Paterson
\nProduced and edited by Amelia Hilton
\nOriginal music by Sonia Kilman
\n(Facebook: www.facebook.com/sonia.killmann.3
\nInstagram: @dream__beings)
\nRecording facilities provided by the University of Glasgow Critical Studies department