Gramophone

Published: March 25, 2017, 8 p.m.

\u201cSuperstar\u201d economics \u2013 how the gramophone led to a winner-take-all dynamic in the performing industry. Elizabeth Billington was a British soprano in the 18th century. She was so famous, London\u2019s two leading opera houses scrambled desperately to secure her performances. In 1801 she ended up singing at both venues, alternating between the two, and pulling in at least \xa310,000. A remarkable sum, much noted at the time. But in today\u2019s terms, it\u2019s a mere \xa3687,000, or about a million dollars; one per cent of a similarly famous solo artist\u2019s annual earnings today. What explains the difference? The gramophone. And, as Tim Harford explains, technological innovations have created \u201csuperstar\u201d economics in other sectors too.

Producer: Ben Crighton\nEditors: Richard Knight and Richard Vadon

(Image: Thomas Edison Phonograph, Credit: James Steidl/Shutterstock)